Long, long ago, Tier X Perma-Camo didn't exist.
But Tier IX gets 20% and Tier X gets a whopping 50%. Tier VIII and below have a more modest 10% cost reduction which really isn't much. Tier IX-X Perma-Camo have better servicing cost reduction. Playing well in High Tier also means good rewards. Premium Ships have a lot less costs to run them, and this makes a big difference in High Tier. In the very old days, especially when High Tier Premium Ships were rarer and Tier X had no Perma-Camo with big cost cutting perks, a lot of guys hanged around Mid Tiers (V-VI) to make money so they could feed their High Tier play. Then VIII North Carolina was notably expensive. When I was new I noticed a good spike in costs when I left Tier VI and got into my first Tier VII, Colorado. Even the shells, torps, even aircraft used during a game goes towards your post battle costs. The higher the tier the costlier it is due to servicing costs. one can do the math based upon their personal history and decide for themselves what feels optimal. Keep in mind that random battles have higher potential earnings when compared to co-op battles.Ĭo-op is more relaxing, in my opinion, and one can often squeeze more battles into an hour of play-time, so. The "sweet spot" is Tier 5 (for the earnings versus service-costs ratio) and Tier 6 & Tier 7, because one can participate in Scenario Operations (which tend to provide higher earnings potential). Thanks to my allies & adversaries for keeping it interesting and for playing well enough to draw the match out to 20 minutes or so. Once upon a time I stuck a bunch of signal flags and a one-use camo on my Hosho and had a 500k+ credit game in a random battle. If your purpose is strictly to earn credits, then there is nothing wrong with playing lower tier ships. So my question is that is it worth buying them again for credit farming? Recenlty, I took a look at my older screenshots and realized that I earned more credits with tier 4-5 ships than tier 8 North Carolina.
0 kommentar(er)
